Advanced neuroimaging of vascular cognitive impairment and dementia: biomarkers, guidelines, and clinical… | ScholarDeck

Paper

Advanced neuroimaging of vascular cognitive impairment and dementia: biomarkers, guidelines, and clinical impact.

New research · Radiology

The British journal of radiology · 3w

ReviewThe British journal of radiology· Aug 2026

Advanced neuroimaging of vascular cognitive impairment and dementia: biomarkers, guidelines, and clinical impact.

Jose Federico Ojeda-Esparza, Daniele Botta, Aikaterini Fitsiori … Felix T Kurz

Read paper

NeuroradiologyReviewDiagnosisQ1IF 3.7

Vascular cognitive impairment accounts for 27-33% of dementia cases.

Advanced neuroimaging of vascular cognitive impairment and dementia: biomarkers, guidelines, and clinical impact.

Jose Federico Ojeda-Esparza … Felix T Kurz

The British journal of radiology · Aug 2026 · Q1 in Radiology

Results

27-33%

vascular disease drives roughly a third of dementia, a modifiable target

More results

Neuroimaging is central to detection, phenotyping, and longitudinal monitoring.

“

Conclusion

We outline current limitations of standardisation, reproducibility, and external validation that remain prerequisites before quantitative vascular cognitive impairment and dementia imaging achieves formal regulatory biomarker qualification.

Read paper

0 comments

No comments yet. Be the first.

ScholarDeck.

Join the discussion on this paper

Create your profile

Related papers

Latest Foundational

Study

94%

The positron emission tomography/computed tomography accurately detects nearly all patients with cardiac amyloidosis

Cohort Study

97%

97% of preterm infants who developed bronchopulmonary dysplasia were correctly identified.

Cohort Study

3.70 ± 2.49

pre-weaning lung ultrasound scores were low, indicating improved lung aeration

Case-control

91%

this diameter correctly identifies most patients with HIE

Cohort Study

19.2%

Just under 1 in 5 spinal MRIs in children found abnormalities tied to their symptoms

Study

2.5–3.3 months

Average difference between the two bone age methods was small in most age groups.

Study

P-value < 0.0001

post-course scores were higher than pre-course, unlikely due to chance

Cross-sectional

7.3%

CT scans in kids climbed sharply each year after years of decline