Evaluation of a virtual reality-based perimetry device (RVF100) for visual field testing: a comparison with the Humphrey visual field analyzer.

The Bland-Altman analysis showed a mean difference in sensitivity of -1.06 decibels (dB) (95% CI: -4.2 to 2 dB).

RVF100 had shorter test durations (5.41 vs 6.96 min; p < 0.001), fewer fixation losses (1.79% vs 5.59%; p < 0.001), and slightly higher false positives rates (3.44% vs 1.92%; p < 0.001).

Usability results showed 90% preferred RVF100 over HVF for comfort (86.4%) and engagement (95.3%).