Post

New research · Ophthalmology
Translational vision science & technology · 17h
AI / informaticsTranslational vision science & technology · 2026

Artificial Intelligence-Driven Differentiation Between Uveal Melanoma and Nevus Based on Fundus Photographs: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Theofilos Kanavos, Effrosyni Birbas, Jasmine H Francis … Theodoros P Zanos
Read paper
OphthalmologyAI / informatics

Artificial intelligence models distinguish uveal melanoma from nevus on fundus photos with high accuracy

Artificial Intelligence-Driven Differentiation Between Uveal Melanoma and Nevus Based on Fundus Photographs: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Theofilos Kanavos … Theodoros P Zanos
Translational vision science & technology · 2026
Background

Distinguishing uveal melanoma (uveal melanoma) from uveal nevus (uveal nevus) is often challenging yet crucial for appropriate management.

Purpose

This study aimed to examine the ability of artificial intelligence (artificial intelligence) models to differentiate uveal melanoma from uveal nevus based on fundus photographs.

Methods

We systematically searched four databases through July 6, 2025, for studies developing machine learning models for distinguishing uveal melanoma from uveal nevus using fundus photographs as input.

n = 6208 participants
Results

Artificial intelligence correctly told melanoma from a harmless mole with excellent overall accuracy

Overall pooled
0.915AUC
Externally validated
0.873AUC
More results

Our review included seven articles with 6208 participants in total.

Six studies used deep learning and one applied conventional machine learning.

Only two studies conducted external validation.

More results

In subgroup analysis, externally validated models retained a promising discriminative ability with a subtotal pooled AUC of 0.873.

“
Conclusion · 1 of 3

Machine learning algorithms showcase consistently high performance in differentiating uveal melanoma from uveal nevus based on fundus photographs, supporting their potential role as adjunctive tools in clinical practice.

Conclusion · 2 of 3

Their objective, reproducible assessments may improve referrals, guide clinical decision-making, and boost diagnostic confidence across health care providers.

Conclusion · 3 of 3

However, existing evidence is highly heterogeneous and constrained by small dataset sizes and limited external validation.

Read paper
0 comments

No comments yet. Be the first.

Related papers

LatestFoundational
AI / Informatics
0·962 for OCT
MerMED-FM was very accurate at diagnosing diseases using eye scans
AI / Informatics
0.98
Artificial intelligence's eyelid-height measurements matched doctors' manual measurements almost perfectly
AI / Informatics
92.1%
combining eye scans and photos correctly told benign from cancerous lesions apart nearly every time
Cohort Study
28.6%
recurred locally in more than 1 in 4 patients over years of follow-up
Cohort Study
-0.395
excision group's post-op eyelid fullness score was lower - greater improvement
Cohort Study
86.7%
of infants probed after 12 months still had unresolved tear duct blockage
Observational
16%
eyelid tissue in rosacea patients showed less of this key repair-signaling protein inside cell nuclei
Cohort Study
25%
about 1 in 4 treated cases had symptoms return after improving