Post

New research · Ophthalmology
Graefe's archive for clinical and experimental ophthalmology = Albrecht von Graefes Archiv fur klinische und experimentelle Ophthalmologie · 1d
AI / informaticsGraefe's archive for clinical and experimental ophthalmology = Albrecht von Graefes Archiv fur klinische und experimentelle Ophthalmologie · 2026

Imaging-based machine learning for the diagnosis and prognosis of uveal melanoma: a systematic review and meta analysis.

Andres Bravo-Gonzalez, Pablo Dominguez-Ruiz, Maria J Buitrago-Gonzalez … Pedro F Salazar
Read paper
OphthalmologyAI / informatics

Ultrasound-based AI models diagnose uveal melanoma more specifically than fundus-based models.

Imaging-based machine learning for the diagnosis and prognosis of uveal melanoma: a systematic review and meta analysis.

Andres Bravo-Gonzalez … Pedro F Salazar
Graefe's archive for clinical and experimental ophthalmology = Albrecht von Graefes Archiv fur klinische und experimentelle Ophthalmologie · 2026
Background

Uveal melanoma (uveal melanoma) is the most common primary intraocular malignancy in adults and carries a high risk of metastasis and poor prognosis when diagnosed late.

Purpose

To systematically review and meta-analyze the performance of published machine learning/deep learning algorithms using ocular imaging on detecting and predicting prognosis of uveal melanoma.

Methods

A systematic search was conducted in PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, Embase, and IEEE Xplore up to June 2025 for English and Spanish publications since 2012.

n = 4,600 patients
Results

ultrasound AI correctly ruled out non-melanoma cases more often than fundus-photo AI

78.21%
Sensitivity
94.28%
Specificity
More results

Thirteen diagnostic studies met inclusion criteria.

Pooled sensitivity was 78.21% and specificity 94.28%.

0.984 (ultrasound; Δ0.073, bootstrap 95% CI − 0.101 to 0.143).

More results

Six prognostic studies (up to 4,600 patients) reported AUCs between 0.71 and 0.92 for predicting metastasis, survival, or enucleation, though all lacked external validation.

“
Conclusion · 1 of 3

Machine learning and deep learning models show strong diagnostic performance and emerging prognostic value in uveal melanoma. However, reproducibility and real-world validation remain limited.

Conclusion · 2 of 3

New foundation models such as RETFound and VisionFM, trained on large multimodal eye datasets, could improve standardization, explainability, and cross-center generalization.

Conclusion · 3 of 3

As these models evolve, they have the potential to become essential tools in clinical practice, accelerating the translation of AI into reliable, routine implementation in ocular oncology.

Read paper
0 comments

No comments yet. Be the first.

Related papers

LatestFoundational
AI / Informatics
0·962 for OCT
MerMED-FM was very accurate at diagnosing diseases using eye scans
AI / Informatics
0.98
Artificial intelligence's eyelid-height measurements matched doctors' manual measurements almost perfectly
AI / Informatics
92.1%
combining eye scans and photos correctly told benign from cancerous lesions apart nearly every time
Cohort Study
28.6%
recurred locally in more than 1 in 4 patients over years of follow-up
Cohort Study
-0.395
excision group's post-op eyelid fullness score was lower - greater improvement
Cohort Study
86.7%
of infants probed after 12 months still had unresolved tear duct blockage
Observational
16%
eyelid tissue in rosacea patients showed less of this key repair-signaling protein inside cell nuclei
Cohort Study
25%
about 1 in 4 treated cases had symptoms return after improving