Post

New research · Cardiology
Journal of the American College of Cardiology · 4d
Cohort studyJournal of the American College of Cardiology · 2026

Health Status Outcomes 7 Years After Transcatheter or Surgical Aortic Valve Replacement in Low-Surgical Risk Patients With Aortic Stenosis.

Michael I Brener, David J Cohen, Susheel K Kodali … Suzanne V Arnold
Read paper
CardiologyCohort study

Transcatheter aortic valve replacement led to substantially better health status at 1 month.

Health Status Outcomes 7 Years After Transcatheter or Surgical Aortic Valve Replacement in Low-Surgical Risk Patients With Aortic Stenosis.

Michael I Brener … Suzanne V Arnold
Journal of the American College of Cardiology · 2026
Background

Transcatheter aortic valve replacement (transcatheter aortic valve replacement) results in early improvements in health status outcomes relative to surgical aortic valve replacement (surgical aortic valve replacement) in low-surgical risk patients with symptomatic severe aortic stenosis.

Purpose

The purpose of this study was to compare long-term health status outcomes between transcatheter aortic valve replacement and surgical aortic valve replacement in low-risk patients and explore heterogeneity of treatment effect.

Methods

The PARTNER 3 (Placement of Aortic Transcatheter Valves) trial randomized patients with severe aortic stenosis and low surgical risk 1:1 to transcatheter aortic valve replacement with a balloon-expandable valve vs surgical aortic valve replacement.

n = 943 patients
Results

transcatheter aortic valve replacement led to substantially better health status at 1 month

MD 16.20 (95% CI 14.30 to 18.10)
null 0
14.30
18.10
CI excludes the null - significant
More results

The analytic cohort included 943 patients enrolled in the PARTNER 3 trial who had baseline Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire assessments and underwent their assigned procedure (494 transcatheter aortic valve replacement, 449 surgical aortic valve replacement; mean age: 73.5 ± 5.9 years; 69.2% men; mean Society of Thoracic Surgeons-Predicted Risk of Mortality: 1.9% ± 0.6%; mean Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire-overall summary [Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire-OS] score: 70.9 ± 20.5).

More results

Transcatheter aortic valve replacement and surgical aortic valve replacement both resulted in significant improvements in Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire and Short Form-36 Heath Survey summary scores relative to baseline through 7-year follow-up.

“
Conclusion · 1 of 3

Patients with severe aortic stenosis at low surgical risk had substantial improvement in patient-reported health status with either transcatheter aortic valve replacement or surgical aortic valve replacement that was sustained through 7 years.

Conclusion · 2 of 3

Patients had earlier recovery with transcatheter aortic valve replacement, but health status outcomes after 2 years were similar between treatment groups.

Conclusion · 3 of 3

(PARTNER 3 Trial: Safety and Effectiveness of the SAPIEN 3 Transcatheter Heart Valve in Low Risk Patients With Aortic Stenosis; NCT02675114).

Read paper
0 comments

No comments yet. Be the first.

Related papers

LatestFoundational
Cohort Study
93%
more patients completed their follow-up cancer treatment within 100 days of surgery
Review
21.99%
the higher percentage of maxillomandibular advancement patients needing surgical implants removed
Cohort Study
-0.23 to 0.31
this range confirms both robotic methods are equally accurate in thigh bone rotation
Guideline
13 recommendations
expert panel agreed on recommendations for heart valve replacement in children
AI / Informatics
AUROC: 0.795±0.092
Swarm Learning achieved an AUROC of 0.795 for accurately grading laparoscopic appendicitis.
Cohort Study
92.3%
of patients had their nose septum holes fully healed after repair
Cohort Study
32%
of infants developed worse heart valve leaking after heart surgery
AI / Informatics
0.833
how accurately the model predicted heart and lung problems in people without symptoms