Post

New research · Ophthalmology
JAMA ophthalmology · 5d
Cross-sectionalJAMA ophthalmology · 2025

Commercial Price Variation in Ophthalmology.

Alexander P Philips, Christopher Whaley
Read paper
OphthalmologyCross-sectional

Facility fees for eye procedures vary far more across insurers than professional fees.

Commercial Price Variation in Ophthalmology.

Alexander P Philips, Christopher Whaley
JAMA ophthalmology · 2025
Purpose

To assess the variation in commercial insurance payment rates for common ophthalmology procedures across major national insurers and identify patterns in professional and facility fees.

Methods

DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: This cross-sectional study used January 2025 Transparency in Coverage data, payment rates negotiated between insurers and health care professionals from 4 large national insurers (Blue Cross Blue Shield, United Healthcare, Cigna, and Aetna) for 10 common ophthalmology procedures.

n = 684 506 professional fee price
2
Results
2
to 4
facility prices swing more between insurers than doctor fees do
n = 684 506 professional fee price
More results

Blue Cross Blue Shield maintained consistently higher payments (14% above market average for professional fees; 13% above for facility fees), while Aetna demonstrated dramatic variation with professional fees 54% below average but facility fees 45% above average.

More results

Geographic analysis revealed substantial state-level variability, with facility prices for standard cataract surgeries showing up to 5-fold differences between upper and lower bounds across states.

“
Conclusion · 1 of 2

This study reveals substantial variability in commercial insurance payment rates for ophthalmology procedures, particularly in facility fees.

Conclusion · 2 of 2

These findings indicate that market dynamics, insurer-health care professional negotiations, and geographic factors substantially influence price variation, which has important implications for health care affordability and access to ophthalmologic care.

Read paper
0 comments

No comments yet. Be the first.

Related papers

LatestFoundational
AI / Informatics
0·962 for OCT
MerMED-FM was very accurate at diagnosing diseases using eye scans
AI / Informatics
0.98
Artificial intelligence's eyelid-height measurements matched doctors' manual measurements almost perfectly
AI / Informatics
92.1%
combining eye scans and photos correctly told benign from cancerous lesions apart nearly every time
Cohort Study
28.6%
recurred locally in more than 1 in 4 patients over years of follow-up
Cohort Study
-0.395
excision group's post-op eyelid fullness score was lower - greater improvement
Cohort Study
86.7%
of infants probed after 12 months still had unresolved tear duct blockage
Observational
16%
eyelid tissue in rosacea patients showed less of this key repair-signaling protein inside cell nuclei
Cohort Study
25%
about 1 in 4 treated cases had symptoms return after improving