Post

New research · Ophthalmology
International journal of retina and vitreous · 22h
AI / informaticsInternational journal of retina and vitreous · 2026

Automated diabetic retinopathy grading and screening using deep learning.

Ahmed M Nashaat Ali Rady, Mohamed A Azim, Ahmed AbdelMoety, Mohamed Abdelmoaty Ahmed
Read paper
OphthalmologyAI / informatics

Deep learning models show high accuracy for binary diabetic retinopathy screening.

Automated diabetic retinopathy grading and screening using deep learning.

Ahmed M Nashaat Ali Rady et al. · International journal of retina and vitreous · 2026
Background

To develop and benchmark a unified Deep Learning (DL) pipeline for automated detection and five-level grading of Diabetic Retinopathy (DR), and to derive a high-performance binary screening endpoint (DR vs No DR) suitable for scalable use in resource-limited settings.

Purpose

To develop and benchmark a unified Deep Learning (DL) pipeline for automated detection and five-level grading of Diabetic Retinopathy (DR), and to derive a high-performance binary screening endpoint (DR vs No DR) suitable for scalable use in resource-limited settings.

Methods

A publicly available five-class DR fundus dataset of 3,500 color photographs graded using the International Clinical Diabetic Retinopathy (ICDR) scale was used.

n = 3,500 color photographs
AUROC ≈0.982-0.990
Results
This indicates the models' high accuracy in detecting diabetic retinopathy
n = 3,500 color photographs
More results

For five-class grading, VGG16 achieved the highest accuracy (0.7686) and weighted Jaccard index (0.6572), while EfficientNetV2B2 provided the best balanced accuracy (0.6128) and macro Area Under the Receiver Operating Characteristic Curve (AUROC 0.9158).

Misclassifications were concentrated between adjacent severity levels.

“
Conclusion · 1 of 3

The proposed DL pipeline delivers robust multiclass DR grading and highly discriminative binary screening using widely available CNN backbones.

Conclusion · 2 of 3

Operating-point calibration enables sensitivity-oriented triage or specificity-oriented confirmation, supporting teleophthalmology and task-shifted DR screening programs to expand coverage and reduce preventable vision loss.

Conclusion · 3 of 3

CLINICAL TRIAL NUMBER: Not applicable.

Read paper
0 comments

No comments yet. Be the first.

Related papers

LatestFoundational
Cohort Study
median 9
optometry referrals contained more complete documentation for glaucoma
Study
71.27%
medical students' higher accuracy in identifying eye infections after artificial intelligence training
Cross-sectional
64%
most patients reported little difficulty with their eye injections
Cross-sectional
37%
Only 37% of primary care providers and endocrinologists correctly identified diabetic retinopathy status.
Randomized Trial
adjusted difference -4.97
Baduanjin exercise led to a better overall quality of life than routine care
Study
58.26%
Qwen-7B correctly found eye diseases in over half of cases without specific training
Case Report
24 months
the patient's eye cancer remained gone for this period after treatment
Study
Mean 184 vs. 137
Residents in subsidized programs performed more cataract surgeries as primary surgeon.