Post

New research · Ophthalmology
International journal of retina and vitreous · 23h
AI / informaticsInternational journal of retina and vitreous · 2026

Automated diabetic retinopathy grading and screening using deep learning.

Ahmed M Nashaat Ali Rady, Mohamed A Azim, Ahmed AbdelMoety, Mohamed Abdelmoaty Ahmed
Read paper
OphthalmologyAI / informatics

Deep learning models show high accuracy for binary diabetic retinopathy screening.

Automated diabetic retinopathy grading and screening using deep learning.

Ahmed M Nashaat Ali Rady et al. · International journal of retina and vitreous · 2026
Background

To develop and benchmark a unified Deep Learning (DL) pipeline for automated detection and five-level grading of Diabetic Retinopathy (DR), and to derive a high-performance binary screening endpoint (DR vs No DR) suitable for scalable use in resource-limited settings.

Purpose

To develop and benchmark a unified Deep Learning (DL) pipeline for automated detection and five-level grading of Diabetic Retinopathy (DR), and to derive a high-performance binary screening endpoint (DR vs No DR) suitable for scalable use in resource-limited settings.

Methods

A publicly available five-class DR fundus dataset of 3,500 color photographs graded using the International Clinical Diabetic Retinopathy (ICDR) scale was used.

n = 3,500 color photographs
AUROC ≈0.982-0.990
Results
This indicates the models' high accuracy in detecting diabetic retinopathy
n = 3,500 color photographs
More results

For five-class grading, VGG16 achieved the highest accuracy (0.7686) and weighted Jaccard index (0.6572), while EfficientNetV2B2 provided the best balanced accuracy (0.6128) and macro Area Under the Receiver Operating Characteristic Curve (AUROC 0.9158).

Misclassifications were concentrated between adjacent severity levels.

“
Conclusion · 1 of 3

The proposed DL pipeline delivers robust multiclass DR grading and highly discriminative binary screening using widely available CNN backbones.

Conclusion · 2 of 3

Operating-point calibration enables sensitivity-oriented triage or specificity-oriented confirmation, supporting teleophthalmology and task-shifted DR screening programs to expand coverage and reduce preventable vision loss.

Conclusion · 3 of 3

CLINICAL TRIAL NUMBER: Not applicable.

Read paper
0 comments

No comments yet. Be the first.

Related papers

LatestFoundational
AI / Informatics
difference, 0
AI and human experts had the same median quality scores for eye care questions
Case-control
0 of 28
distinct structural changes were absent in all 28 healthy control eyes
Cohort Study
RR, 0.91
Black patients were less likely to start medication for their eye condition
AI / Informatics
100% diagnostic sensitivity
ROFI correctly found every case of eye disease
AI / Informatics
10.50-point increase
students trained with digital patients had higher history-taking assessment scores
AI / Informatics
0.877
The o1 large language model correctly answered 87.7% of ophthalmology questions.
Cohort Study
HR 4.85
chronic pain conditions mean a nearly five times higher risk of developing dry eye disease
Cohort Study
12 per 10,000
a higher rate of eye infections after dexamethasone implant injections