Post

New research · Radiology
Hepatology communications · 23h
Cohort studyHepatology communications · 2026

Incidence and diagnostic yield of repeat imaging-based screening for hepatic arteriovenous malformations in patients with HHT.

Benjamin Cho, Leena Usman, Torianna Lomax Truong … Jin Ge
Read paper
RadiologyCohort study

Repeat liver imaging in hereditary hemorrhagic telangiectasia patients detects 6.7% clinically significant malformations.

Incidence and diagnostic yield of repeat imaging-based screening for hepatic arteriovenous malformations in patients with HHT.

Benjamin Cho et al. · Hepatology communications · 2026
Background

Hepatic arteriovenous malformations (HAVMs) are a common visceral manifestation of hereditary hemorrhagic telangiectasia that can lead to heart failure and biliary ischemia.

Purpose

We sought to clarify the prevalence of clinically significant HAVMs following negative or nonactionable imaging.

6.7%
Results
Among hereditary hemorrhagic telangiectasia patients re-imaged, 6.7% had clinically significant liver arteriovenous malformations.
More results

We isolated all adult patients with hereditary hemorrhagic telangiectasia evaluated at the University of California, San Francisco HHT Center of Excellence between 2013 and 2025.

Of the 195, 30 (15.4%) underwent repeat hepatic imaging.

Across 48 total repeat imaging studies, the detection rate per study was 4.2%.

More results

Across 386.5 person-years of follow-up, the incidence rate of clinically significant HAVM recognition was 0.52 per 100 person-years.

“
Conclusion · 1 of 2

Both instances of HAVM identification reflected evolving clinical features and reinterpretation of prior imaging, not de novo lesion development.

Conclusion · 2 of 2

These findings support periodic reassessment of initial negative/nonactionable screening studies, with a low threshold for reassessment in the presence of new signs and symptoms.

Read paper
0 comments

No comments yet. Be the first.

Related papers

LatestFoundational
Review
10-60 mGy
the range of radiation exposure to the baby from belly or pelvis CT scans
Cross-sectional
56.5%
More than half of computed tomography reports did not mention tumor deposits.
Cohort Study
kappa = 0.819-0.838
adjudicated CT reports showed excellent agreement with the final diagnosis
AI / Informatics
0.87 million
the AI model learned from nearly a million image-report pairs
Guideline
“In those instances where peer reviewed literature is lacking or equivocal, experts may be the primary evidentiary source available to formulate a recommendation.”
Study
5.24 million
the number of brain scans used to train the new artificial intelligence model
AI / Informatics
106 anatomical structures
whole-body reference charts were created for this many different body parts
AI / Informatics
OR = 6.15
Large language models were much more likely to answer easier questions correctly than harder ones