Post

New research · Plastic Surgery
Aesthetic plastic surgery · 1d
Cohort studyAesthetic plastic surgery · 2026

Characterization of Sex-Specific Immediate Breast Reconstruction Trends Following Mastectomy Between 2005 and 2023.

Joseph D Quick, Keyvon Rashidi, Patrick Potoczak … Graham S Schwarz
Read paper
Plastic SurgeryCohort study

Only 21.0% of male patients undergoing mastectomy received immediate breast reconstruction.

Characterization of Sex-Specific Immediate Breast Reconstruction Trends Following Mastectomy Between 2005 and 2023.

Joseph D Quick et al. · Aesthetic plastic surgery · 2026
Background

Immediate breast reconstruction (IBR) following mastectomy is a standard of care in female patients; however, the role and characteristics of IBR in male patients remain poorly defined.

Purpose

Here, the authors aim to investigate IBR trends in both males and females.

Methods

A retrospective analysis of male and female patients undergoing mastectomy from 2005 to 2023 was conducted using the National Surgical Quality Improvement Project (NSQIP) database (n = 450,925; male = 7,445, female=443,480).

n = 450,925
21.0%
Results
Immediate breast reconstruction was performed in 21.0% of male patients after mastectomy.
n = 450,925
More results

Among patients undergoing IBR, the most common male breast reconstruction procedures were nipple-areolar complex reconstruction (43.9%) and tissue expander placement (9.4%), whereas the most common female breast reconstruction procedures were tissue expander placement (42.7%) and implant placement (23.3%).

More results

There was an association between year and rate of IBR for both male (β = 0.2036, 95% CI 0.1871-0.2203, p < 0.0001) and female (β = 0.0428, 95% CI 0.0415-0.0440, p < 0.0001) patients.

“
Conclusion · 1 of 3

Compared to female patients, IBR remains low in male patients. However, the year-to-year growth in IBR is encouraging and may indicate increasing awareness and acceptance of reconstruction in male patients.

Conclusion · 2 of 3

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE III: This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article.

Conclusion · 3 of 3

For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266 .

Read paper
0 comments

No comments yet. Be the first.

Related papers

LatestFoundational
Study
395 eligible publications
total research papers on robot-assisted ureteral reconstructive surgery included in this study
Review
145 publications
the growing number of research papers on robotic microsurgery
Study
28%
Only 28% of units had a formal pathway for contralateral symmetrising mastectomy.
Study
2023-2025
most important research on these weight loss medications was published very recently
Review
80%
radial shockwave therapy reduced facial skin pore size by this amount
Study
88.9%
patients could achieve orgasm after clitoral reconstruction surgery
Study
40.77 hours
extensive video duration in the new dataset for delicate surgery training
Cross-sectional
39.2%
primary care doctors relied on personal judgment for plastic surgery referrals