Post

New research · Plastic Surgery
Aesthetic plastic surgery · 1d
Cohort studyAesthetic plastic surgery · 2026

Characterization of Sex-Specific Immediate Breast Reconstruction Trends Following Mastectomy Between 2005 and 2023.

Joseph D Quick, Keyvon Rashidi, Patrick Potoczak … Graham S Schwarz
Read paper
Plastic SurgeryCohort study

Only 21.0% of male patients undergoing mastectomy received immediate breast reconstruction.

Characterization of Sex-Specific Immediate Breast Reconstruction Trends Following Mastectomy Between 2005 and 2023.

Joseph D Quick et al. · Aesthetic plastic surgery · 2026
Background

Immediate breast reconstruction (IBR) following mastectomy is a standard of care in female patients; however, the role and characteristics of IBR in male patients remain poorly defined.

Purpose

Here, the authors aim to investigate IBR trends in both males and females.

Methods

A retrospective analysis of male and female patients undergoing mastectomy from 2005 to 2023 was conducted using the National Surgical Quality Improvement Project (NSQIP) database (n = 450,925; male = 7,445, female=443,480).

n = 450,925
21.0%
Results
Immediate breast reconstruction was performed in 21.0% of male patients after mastectomy.
n = 450,925
More results

Among patients undergoing IBR, the most common male breast reconstruction procedures were nipple-areolar complex reconstruction (43.9%) and tissue expander placement (9.4%), whereas the most common female breast reconstruction procedures were tissue expander placement (42.7%) and implant placement (23.3%).

More results

There was an association between year and rate of IBR for both male (β = 0.2036, 95% CI 0.1871-0.2203, p < 0.0001) and female (β = 0.0428, 95% CI 0.0415-0.0440, p < 0.0001) patients.

“
Conclusion · 1 of 3

Compared to female patients, IBR remains low in male patients. However, the year-to-year growth in IBR is encouraging and may indicate increasing awareness and acceptance of reconstruction in male patients.

Conclusion · 2 of 3

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE III: This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article.

Conclusion · 3 of 3

For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266 .

Read paper
0 comments

No comments yet. Be the first.

Related papers

LatestFoundational
Cohort Study
31.0%
31% of patients with hypoplastic left heart syndrome survived without transplant for 35 years.
Cohort Study
56 to 36 days
median wait time for breast cancer surgery with immediate reconstruction was reduced
Cohort Study
16%
higher online engagement helps explain a portion of how often plastic surgery research is cited
Study
395 eligible publications
total research papers on robot-assisted ureteral reconstructive surgery included in this study
Study
2023-2025
most important research on these weight loss medications was published very recently
AI / Informatics
100%
The specialized AI system correctly identified all Current Procedural Terminology codes for simple procedures.
Study
15.89%
the yearly growth in studies on robot-assisted plastic surgery
Study
40.77 hours
extensive video duration in the new dataset for delicate surgery training