Dupilumab outcomes in pediatric asthma by early eosinophil status: post hoc analysis of VOYAGE/EXCURSION.
About 22% of children on dupilumab had early eosinophil increases, without affecting efficacy or safety
Dupilumab outcomes in pediatric asthma by early eosinophil status: post hoc analysis of VOYAGE/EXCURSION.
Transient increases in blood eosinophils may accompany dupilumab treatment, but these increases are rarely associated with clinical symptoms, and clinical significance in children needs further assessment.
To evaluate the long-term efficacy and safety of dupilumab in children aged 6 to 11 years with type 2 asthma who completed the VOYAGE study and enrolled in the open-label extension study EXCURSION, and experienced an early increase in blood eosinophils.
This post hoc analysis assessed annualized severe exacerbation rates, change from baseline in pre-bronchodilator percent predicted (pp) FEV 1 and Z-score, 5-item Asthma Control Questionnaire Interviewer Administered (ACQ-5IA), fractional exhaled nitric oxide (FeNO), blood eosinophils and total IgE, and safety, in subgroups with early eosinophil increase (children with <500 cells/μL at baseline and ≥500 cells/μL at VOYAGE week 12).
Dupilumab reduced exacerbation rates versus placebo during VOYAGE across subgroups, with effects maintained in EXCURSION.
Children switching from placebo to dupilumab also experienced consistent improvements similar to those who had been receiving dupilumab.
Improvements in FEV 1 and Z-score, ACQ-5IA, FeNO, and total IgE were observed in children with and without early blood eosinophil increases.
No safety differences were observed across subgroups.
Dupilumab versus placebo reduced exacerbations, improved lung function and asthma control, and decreased inflammatory biomarkers in children with type 2 asthma across subgroups with and without early blood eosinophil increases up to 2 years.
No differences in the dupilumab safety profile were observed in children with early eosinophil increases.
CLINICAL IMPLICATIONS: Early eosinophil increases during dupilumab treatment did not affect efficacy or safety, supporting continued therapy in the absence of symptoms.