Post

New research · Cardiology
JACC. Advances · 17h
StudyJACC. Advances · 2026

Prevalence of Bullying, Discrimination, and Harassment Among Women in Cardiology: A Snapshot Australasian Survey.

Jaya Chandrasekhar, Swati Mukherjee
Read paper
CardiologyStudy

Nearly 9 in 10 surveyed women in cardiology reported bullying, discrimination, or harassment

Prevalence of Bullying, Discrimination, and Harassment Among Women in Cardiology: A Snapshot Australasian Survey.

Jaya Chandrasekhar et al. · JACC. Advances · 2026
Background

Bullying, discrimination, and harassment (BDH) are prevalent in medicine and are more commonly experienced by women.

Purpose

The Australia New Zealand Women in Cardiology (WIC) working group sought to assess the current prevalence of BDH among females in cardiology through a snapshot survey.

Methods

The survey was developed by 2 women cardiologists and distributed to members of the WIC email list (180 members).

n = 105 individuals
Results
Nearly 9 in 10 women in cardiology faced bullying, discrimination, or harassment at work
n = 105 individuals
More results

The survey was completed by 105 individuals (58.33% completion rate).

Majority (75.2%) of these behaviors were displayed by cardiology consultants.

Of the respondents, 29.5% did not know how to react to the behavior and 17.1% reported the behavior higher up but no action was taken.

More results

Nearly half (47.6%) of the respondents were worried about the effect of reporting on day-to-day work or training.

“
Conclusion · 1 of 2

BDH was noted to be highly prevalent from this snapshot survey of women in cardiology.

Conclusion · 2 of 2

Urgent measures are required to mitigate and abolish these negative behaviors, a process that requires significant changes from all stakeholders involved in cardiology workplaces.

Read paper
0 comments

No comments yet. Be the first.

Related papers

LatestFoundational
Cross-sectional
18.2%
Roughly 1 in 5 athletes showed a thicker-walled heart geometry pattern on echocardiogram.
Cohort Study
5.8%
Roughly 1 in 17 patients had a cardiovascular death, heart attack, stroke, or unstable angina
Cohort Study
HR 2.02
Highest third of amplified P-wave duration had ~2x the rate of new atrial fibrillation
Study
up to 17.5 mm
the maximum distance the heart treatment area's center moved during breathing
Cohort Study
ranging from -0.13% to 2.70%
percentage of patients whose risk of death changed, often to higher risk
AI / Informatics
F1 = 0.88
this F1 score indicates high accuracy for artificial intelligence models detecting irregular heartbeat
Cohort Study
OR = 2.78
medium triglyceride-glucose index means much higher odds of serious heart problems during hospitalization
Cohort Study
3%
lower incidence of low blood sugar with the simplified protocol