Post

New research · Ophthalmology
Frontiers in digital health · 23h
AI / informaticsFrontiers in digital health · 2026

Assessing retina-specific ophthalmic counseling generated by an early public large language model across different levels of clinical urgency.

Dominic M Choo, Tyler A Durham, Kishan G Patel
Read paper
OphthalmologyAI / informatics

Medical terminology was a common reason for difficulty understanding large language model counseling.

Assessing retina-specific ophthalmic counseling generated by an early public large language model across different levels of clinical urgency.

Dominic M Choo et al. · Frontiers in digital health · 2026
Purpose

To evaluate how the quality of retina-specific ophthalmology counseling provided by an early publicly available large language model (LLM) differs when advising patients with varying clinical characteristics and risk factors.

Methods

Prospective, cross-sectional study.

49%
Results
nearly half of reasons for difficulty understanding counseling were due to medical words
More results

Counseling accuracy differed across levels of clinical urgency ( p = 0.002) but remained consistent between high- and low-urgency vignettes of AMD ( p = 0.081) and DR ( p = 0.5), albeit not for RD ( P < 0.001).

More results

Counseling urgency did not differ significantly from clinical urgency of all vignettes, except for the high-urgency AMD ( p = 0.013) and high-urgency RD ( p < 0.001).

While counseling urgency did not significantly differ between high- and low-urgency vignettes of AMD ( p = 0.055) and RD ( p = 0.3), it did differ for the DR vignettes ( p < 0.001).

“
Conclusion · 1 of 2

The evaluated LLM-generated counseling outputs were largely similar across the sampled retinal vignettes with differing clinical urgency.

Conclusion · 2 of 2

Future studies should investigate the optimization of LLM prompting needed to garner counseling of consistent/appropriate accuracy, readability, empathy, and communication of urgency for specific conditions.

Read paper
0 comments

No comments yet. Be the first.

Related papers

LatestFoundational
AI / Informatics
difference, 0
AI and human experts had the same median quality scores for eye care questions
Case-control
0 of 28
distinct structural changes were absent in all 28 healthy control eyes
Cohort Study
RR, 0.91
Black patients were less likely to start medication for their eye condition
AI / Informatics
100% diagnostic sensitivity
ROFI correctly found every case of eye disease
AI / Informatics
10.50-point increase
students trained with digital patients had higher history-taking assessment scores
AI / Informatics
0.877
The o1 large language model correctly answered 87.7% of ophthalmology questions.
Cohort Study
HR 4.85
chronic pain conditions mean a nearly five times higher risk of developing dry eye disease
Cohort Study
12 per 10,000
a higher rate of eye infections after dexamethasone implant injections