Post

New research · Ophthalmology
BMJ health & care informatics · 23h
Cohort studyBMJ health & care informatics · 2026

How well do we write for patients? Longitudinal analysis of the readability and complexity of 4.6 million ophthalmic clinical letters.

Ariel Yuhan Ong, Christine A Kiire, Siegfried K Wagner … Pearse A Keane
Read paper
OphthalmologyCohort study

Vast majority of ophthalmology clinic letters are less readable than recommended for patients.

How well do we write for patients? Longitudinal analysis of the readability and complexity of 4.6 million ophthalmic clinical letters.

Ariel Yuhan Ong et al. · BMJ health & care informatics · 2026
Background

Effective clinician-patient communication is a fundamental pillar of high-quality clinical care and can influence patient engagement, treatment adherence and clinical outcomes.

Purpose

We aimed to benchmark this at scale in an ophthalmology setting-the highest-volume outpatient specialty in the United Kingdom (UK) healthcare service.

Methods

Over 4.6 million outpatient clinic letters written for 804 986 patients across 17 subspecialty services were included.

n = 986 patients
Results

most clinic letters were too difficult for patients to read

OR 1.12 (95% CI 1.12 to 1.25)
null = 11.121.25
CI excludes the null - significant
More results

The median FRE was 51.1 (IQR 41.9-58.5), indicating college-level readability which was substantially poorer than recommended for patient-facing materials.

There was a significant decline in FRE over the study period (-0.64 points/annum, p<0.001).

More results

Rate of change varied across subspecialty services and was more pronounced in some such as neuro-ophthalmology (-1.24 points/annum, p<0.001), with few being stable (optometry, p>0.05).

The use of second person terms was very low (median 0 per 100 words, IQR 0.0-1.1).

“
Conclusion

Our findings highlight a persistent gap between policy recommendations and real-world practice, underscoring the need for targeted interventions and innovative approaches to support clearer patient-centred communication to optimise patient outcomes.

Read paper
0 comments

No comments yet. Be the first.

Related papers

LatestFoundational
AI / Informatics
difference, 0
AI and human experts had the same median quality scores for eye care questions
Case-control
0 of 28
distinct structural changes were absent in all 28 healthy control eyes
Cohort Study
RR, 0.91
Black patients were less likely to start medication for their eye condition
AI / Informatics
100% diagnostic sensitivity
ROFI correctly found every case of eye disease
AI / Informatics
10.50-point increase
students trained with digital patients had higher history-taking assessment scores
AI / Informatics
0.877
The o1 large language model correctly answered 87.7% of ophthalmology questions.
Cohort Study
HR 4.85
chronic pain conditions mean a nearly five times higher risk of developing dry eye disease
Cohort Study
12 per 10,000
a higher rate of eye infections after dexamethasone implant injections