Post

New research · Orthopedics
Clinics and practice · 1w
Cohort studyClinics and practice · 2026

Indications, Causes, and Patient Risk Factors for Revision After Total Ankle Arthroplasty: A Descriptive Cross-Registry Analysis of the NJR, AOANJRR, and SwedAnkle Registries.

Sedeek Mosaid, Yousif Jihad, Mostafa Jihad … Paul Lee
Read paper
OrthopedicsCohort study

Younger age associated with doubled revision hazard after total ankle arthroplasty

Indications, Causes, and Patient Risk Factors for Revision After Total Ankle Arthroplasty: A Descriptive Cross-Registry Analysis of the NJR, AOANJRR, and SwedAnkle Registries.

Sedeek Mosaid … Paul Lee
Clinics and practice · 2026
Background

Total ankle arthroplasty (total ankle arthroplasty) is increasingly used to treat end-stage ankle arthritis, but comprehensive cross-registry data on revision patterns remain limited.

Purpose

This study describes indications, causes, and patient risk factors for revisions using three national registries.

Methods

Aggregate data were extracted from the UK National Joint Registry (NJR; 22nd Annual Report 2025; n = 11,321), the Australian Orthopaedic Association National Joint Replacement Registry (AOANJRR; 2025 Ankle Supplementary Report; n = 5379), and the Swedish Ankle Registry (SwedAnkle; Annual Report 2024; n = 1852; survival estimates from a published sub-cohort, n = 1226).

n = 11,321
Results
2.00
patients under 55 had twice the risk of needing their ankle replacement redone
n = 11,321
More results

Across registries, 18,552 primary TAAs were identified.

Ten-year cumulative per cent revision (CPR) was 9.54% (95% confidence interval [CI], 8.75-10.39) in the NJR, 13.5% (95% CI, 12.1-15.1) in the AOANJRR osteoarthritis sub-cohort, and approximately 26% (author-derived from Kaplan-Meier curves; see Methods) in SwedAnkle (1993 onwards implants).

More results

Aseptic loosening was the predominant cause of revision in all three registries; the rank of subsequent causes differed between registries (infection was second in the NJR and AOANJRR; in SwedAnkle, infection ranked below insert wear/breakage at 11.5%).

Sex and American Society of Anesthesiologists (American Society of Anesthesiologists) scores were not significant.

“
Conclusion · 1 of 3

Aseptic loosening was the predominant cause of revision in all three registries.

Conclusion · 2 of 3

The rank of subsequent causes differed: in the NJR and AOANJRR, infection was the second most frequent cause; in SwedAnkle, infection ranked below insert wear/breakage.

Conclusion · 3 of 3

Younger age, obesity, and earlier surgical era were independent predictors of revision in AOANJRR Cox proportional hazards models.

Read paper
0 comments

No comments yet. Be the first.

Related papers

LatestFoundational
Observational
162.3
average time patients spent in the recovery room after hip replacement surgery
Cohort Study
OR = 3.71
far higher odds of sepsis, a dangerous body-wide reaction to infection
Observational
25%
older patients died during follow-up after an early wound infection at the surgery site
Systematic Review
81-91
average hip pain-and-function score after hip replacement; higher scores mean better function
Cohort Study
94.1%
ankles needing no further surgery in the 10 years after replacement; higher is better
Guideline
“Recommendations identified current gaps in knowledge and future areas of needed research.”
Cohort Study
89%
of individuals with this disorder had flat feet that rolled inward
Study
6%
only 6% of open shin bone fractures had their wounds covered early